home
/
governance
/
key governance functions
/
estates and infrastructure
/
the estates committee
The Estates Committee
In overseeing strategy and performance against plans, the governing body may be supported by an estates or buildings committee.
The potential benefits of such a committees are fairly clear. They allow more detailed scrutiny than the main board can give, and also provide a means of focusing expertise, both of the lay members and of any other co opted members.
However, establishing a committee may be seen as a cure all for perceived difficulties, and the potential downside is clear.
- It adds to the time that a given decision will take - minimally two weeks to any business cycle (if committee minutes are to be agreed and circulated in good time before the next meeting of the board), although good management of the business, and the delegation of appropriate decisions will help.
- Some committees in this area simply don't work very well, and rather than concentrating on the important strategic issues tend to get bogged down in the minutiae of car parking and staff accommodation, to the frustration of all parties.
- In some institutions the director of estates may feel that as they are responsible for all aspects of their service, the only form of reporting required is a regular (often annual) report against plans, and approval of project funding above delegated limits where necessary.
In practice, the judgment of whether an estates committee is useful is a matter of assessing the value added by the additional scrutiny against the time and resources involved. Some of the relevant factors to take account of in answering this question are:
- The size of the institution (in small institutions estates matters may more usually be dealt with in the full board).
- The complexity of the existing estate.
- The nature of development plans.
- Whether substantial new building is to be undertaken.
An estates committee does not have to be a permanent committee of the governing body, and a time limited special working group with specific terms of reference can be a very effective alternative, particularly when focusing on strategic issues.
<<Return to previous page To next page>>